↓ Skip to main content

Resveratrol and Clinical Trials: The Crossroad from In Vitro Studies to Human Evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Current Pharmaceutical Design, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 3,701)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
23 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
362 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
381 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resveratrol and Clinical Trials: The Crossroad from In Vitro Studies to Human Evidence
Published in
Current Pharmaceutical Design, September 2013
DOI 10.2174/13816128113199990407
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joao Tomé-Carneiro, Mar Larrosa, Antonio González-Sarrías, Francisco A. Tomás-Barberán, María Teresa García-Conesa, Juan Carlos Espín

Abstract

Resveratrol (3,5,4'-trihydroxy-trans-stilbene) is a non-flavonoid polyphenol that may be present in a limited number of foodstuffs such as grapes and red wine. Resveratrol has been reported to exert a plethora of health benefits through many different mechanisms of action. This versatility and presence in the human diet have drawn the worldwide attention of many research groups over the past twenty years, which has resulted in a huge output of in vitro and animal (preclinical) studies. In line with this expectation, many resveratrol- based nutraceuticals are consumed all over the world with questionable clinical/scientific support. In fact, the confirmation of these benefits in humans through randomized clinical trials is still very limited. The vast majority of preclinical studies have been performed using assay conditions with a questionable extrapolation to humans, i.e. too high concentrations with potential safety concerns (adverse effects and drug interactions), short-term exposures, in vitro tests carried out with non-physiological metabolites and/or concentrations, etc. Unfortunately, all these hypothesis-generating studies have contributed to increased the number of 'potential' benefits and mechanisms of resveratrol but confirmation in humans is very limited. Therefore, there are many issues that should be addressed to avoid an apparent endless loop in resveratrol research. The so-called 'Resveratrol Paradox', i.e., low bioavailability but high bioactivity, is a conundrum not yet solved in which the final responsible actor (if any) for the exerted effects has not yet been unequivocally identified. It is becoming evident that resveratrol exerts cardioprotective benefits through the improvement of inflammatory markers, atherogenic profile, glucose metabolism and endothelial function. However, safety concerns remain unsolved regarding chronic consumption of high RES doses, specially in medicated people. This review will focus on the currently available evidence regarding resveratrol's effects on humans obtained from randomized clinical trials. In addition, we will provide a critical outlook for further research on this molecule that is evolving from a minor dietary compound to a possible multi-target therapeutic drug.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 381 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 378 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 73 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 15%
Student > Master 51 13%
Researcher 40 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 59 15%
Unknown 82 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 78 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 53 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 33 9%
Chemistry 15 4%
Other 55 14%
Unknown 99 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 127. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2020.
All research outputs
#326,948
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Current Pharmaceutical Design
#22
of 3,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,368
of 208,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Pharmaceutical Design
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them